Classification of COPD as ABCD according to GOLD 2011 and 2017 versions in COPD patients at University Medical Center in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Accepted: June 21, 2023
Supplementary: 64
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
In 2017, Global Initiative for Chronic Lung Disease (GOLD) made substantial changes to its ABCD group categorization. Although several studies had been conducted to assess the impact of the new GOLD category, there was no research on the change of the GOLD classification in Vietnam. This retrospective analysis was conducted at Asthma and COPD clinic at the University Medical Center in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Our study population comprised patients visiting Medical Center from January 2018 to January 2020. We categorized patients’ demographic, clinical characteristics and pharmacotherapy based on GOLD 2011 and 2017 guidelines. A comparison between the two versions was also determined. A total of 457 patients were included in this study. The percentage of groups A, B, C and D according to GOLD 2011 was 5%, 20.8%, 13.1% and 61.1%; and according to GOLD 2017 was 6.1%, 34.1%, 12% and 47.8%, respectively. In terms of gender, male patients constituted nearly 95% of the study’s population (433/457 patients). Regarding pharmacotherapy, approximately 20% of the low-risk group (group A-B) was overtreated with ICS components: LABA+ICS (15.8%) and LAMA+LABA+ICS (3.8%). There were 13.3% and 1.1% of patients transferred from D to B and from C to A, respectively. All of them had lower FVC% pred, FEV1% pred and FEV1/FVC than the patients remained in group B or A (p<0.005). This is the first research in Vietnam to show the distribution of COPD patients using both the GOLD 2011 and GOLD 2017 criteria. There was 14% of patients reclassified from high-risk groups to low-risk groups when changing from 2011 to 2017 version and discordance of medications between guidelines and real-life practice. Therefore, clinicians should use their clinical competence to consider patients' conditions before deciding the appropriate therapeutic approach. Consequently, further studies were required to evaluate the effect of the change in GOLD classification.
Ethics Approval
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh city. The data collection process was permitted by the Department of Science and Training of the University Medical CenterPenn State Medical College, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey PA, USA
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.