Work resumption after invasive heart procedures, rehabilitation and ergonomic evaluation: from the hospital to the workplace

Submitted: June 30, 2023
Accepted: July 31, 2023
Published: September 4, 2023
Abstract Views: 588
PDF: 12
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Our Institute adopts a multidisciplinary protocol named “CardioWork” for work resumption after invasive cardiac procedures and subsequent rehabilitation: after evaluation of the cardiac functional profile, the occupational physician analyzes the work activity prior to the cardiopathological event, identifies the presumed task energy requirement (from specific, published tables), and compares it with the exercise test results. Indications regarding the timing and modality of returning to work are formulated accordingly. To verify the reliability of the indications thus provided, we carried out a clinical-functional follow-up study in the workplace with Holter electrocardiography (ECG) and armband measurement of actual energy expenditure. Over the course of 2 years, we enrolled 36 patients (mostly males, aged between 30 and 70 years) who were hospitalized after coronary revascularization, valve replacement, or cardiac defibrillator implant. After rehabilitation, instrumental diagnostics (Holter ECG, echocardiography, exercise test) showed discrete functional conditions, with better values with regard to cardiac function than exercise capacity and effort tolerance. All subjects were judged fit for the job, in most cases with limitations concerning ergonomic factors, working timetable, and/or stress. They returned to work quickly, with good adherence to the indications provided. The workplace Holter ECG did not show appreciable differences compared to the hospital evaluation. In one case, the average energy expenditure measured while working was higher than that inferred from the tables; in the remaining subjects, the actual expenditure coincided with what was expected or was lower. In a minority of cases (39%), the measured average expenditure slightly exceeded the optimal value (35% of the maximal value at the exercise test) recommended at the time of hospital discharge. At the end of the workplace evaluation, it was not necessary to formulate new indications. The study provides further evidence of the effectiveness of the CardioWork protocol in promoting a return to work after invasive heart procedures. Although they need continuous updating, the published estimates of presumed task energy requirements remain reliable. In particularly complex cases, however, it is advisable to carry out a field check of the ergometric assessments performed at the end of rehabilitation.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Lennon RP, Claussen KA, Kuersteiner KA. State of the heart: an overview of the disease burden of cardiovascular disease from an epidemiologic perspective. Prim Care 2018;45:1-15.
World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)
Dégano IR, Salomaa V, Veronesi G, et al. Twenty-five-year trends in myocardial infarction attack and mortality rates, and case-fatality, in six European populations. Heart 2015;101:1413-21. Erratum in: Heart 2018;104:e2.
Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:2982-3021. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:1958-9.
Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020;141:e139-596.
Price AE. Heart disease and work. Heart 2004;90:1077-84.
Bresseleers J, De Sutter J. Return to work after acute coronary syndrome: time for action. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2019;26:1355-7.
Reibis R, Salzwedel A, Abreu A, et al. The importance of return to work: how to achieve optimal reintegration in ACS patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2019;26:1358-69.
Scafa F, Calsamiglia G, Tonini S, et al. Return to work after coronary angioplasty or heart surgery: a 5-year experience with the “CardioWork” protocol. J Occup Environ Med 2012;54:1545-9.
Scafa F, Calsamiglia G, Cadei P, et al. Health and work after invasive heart procedures, rehabilitation and occupational evaluation. Med Lav 2018;109:219-24. [Article in Italian].
Haskell WL, Brachfeld N, Bruce RA, et al. Task force II: determination of occupational working capacity in patients with ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;14:1025-34.
Pezzagno G, Capodaglio E. Criteri di valutazioni energetiche delle attività fisiche. Pavia: La Goliardica Pavese; 1991, p. 269. [Book in Italian].
Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. 2011 Compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:1575-81.
Ceci V, Assennato P, Boncompagni F, et al. ANMCO-SIC-GIVFRC guidelines on cardiac rehabilitation. G Ital Cardiol 1999;29:1057-91. [Article in Italian].
Adduci C, Ali H, Francia P, et al. The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Current trends in clinical practice between guidelines and technology progress. Eur J Intern Med 2019;65:6-11.
Kai SHY, Ferrières J, Rossignol M, et al. Prevalence and determinants of return to work after various coronary events: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sci Rep 2022;12:15348.
Mortensen M, Sandvik RKNM, Svendsen ØS, et al. Return to work after coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement surgery: a scoping review. Scand J Caring Sci 2022;36:893-909.
Monpere C, Francois G, Rondeau du Noyer C, Phan Van J. Return to work after rehabilitation in coronary bypass patients. Role of the occupational medicine specialist during rehabilitation. Eur Heart J 1988;9:S48-53.
Taino G, Brevi M, Gazzoldi T, Imbriani M. Vocational integration of the worker suffering from ischemic heart disease: prognostic factors, occupational evaluation, and criteria for the assessment of their suitability for the specific task. G Ital Med Lav Erg 2013;35:102-19. [Article in Italian].
Borchini R, Ferrario MM. Work ability in workers with heart disease: assessing physical and psycho-social risks. G Ital Med Lav Erg 2019;41:341-3. [Article in Italian].
Werner NE, Ponnala S, Doutcheva N, Holden RJ. Human factors/ergonomics work system analysis of patient work: state of the science and future directions. Int J Qual Health Care 2021;33:60-71.
Candura SM, Frascaroli M, Scafa F. Work reintegration after illness or accident. The role of the occupational physician. In: Argentero P, Fiabane E, eds. Il rientro al lavoro. Milan: R. Cortina Editore; 2016, pp. 297-312. [Book in Italian].

Supporting Agencies

Italian Ministry of Health

How to Cite

Scafa, Fabrizio, Alessia Gallozzi, Giovanni Forni, and Stefano M. Candura. 2023. “Work Resumption After Invasive Heart Procedures, Rehabilitation and Ergonomic Evaluation: From the Hospital to the Workplace”. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease 94 (2). https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2023.2689.