Comparative studies of dual bronchodilation in COPD
Accepted: December 11, 2020
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Dual bronchodilation therapy is becoming the cornerstone for the treatment of COPD because the clinical benefits of LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) are now extensively established. Therefore, it not surprising that a number of LAMA/LABA combinations in a single inhaler have now been approved for clinical use as treatments for patients with COPD. Regrettably, very few head-to-head studies between all of the available LABA/LAMA FDCs have been carried out. This makes choosing the most appropriate FDC difficult. Comparative effectiveness research that also uses conventional meta-analyses to compare different care strategies can help generate useful information. A bidimensional comparative analysis across LAMA/LABA FDCs has suggested constant superiority for tiotropium/olodaterol. However, considering that there is not an equivalent amount of evidence on efficacy outcomes for all LAMA/LABA FDCs, a proper comparison between the different LAMA/LABA FDCs cannot be made yet, and the information available is still rather inconsistent.
Ethics Approval
MC reports grants and personal fees from Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Zambon and personal fees from ABC Farmaceutici, AstraZeneca, Biofutura, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Cipla, Edmond Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Lallemand, Menarini, Mundipharma, Ockham Biotech, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Verona Pharma, outside the submitted work. MGM reports grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis and personal fees from ABC Farmaceutici, AstraZeneca, and Chiesi Farmaceutici, outside the submitted work. PR reports grants and personal fees from Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Novartis and Zambon, and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Biofutura, Edmond Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. LC reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novartis, grants from Chiesi Farmaceutici, personal fees from ABC Farmaceutici, Edmond Pharma, Ockham Biotech, Verona Pharma and Zambon, grants from Almirall, and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted workHow to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Pietro Impellizzeri, Santi Nolasco, Raffaele Campisi, Antonino Cipolla, Alba Borgese, Stefano Alia, Nunzio Crimi, Claudia Crimi, Acute and long-term management of severe bronchiectasis with high flow nasal therapy: a case report , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 93 No. 2 (2023)
- Raj Kumar, Parul Mrigpuri, Shyam Mani Dubey, Rachna Singh, Jyoti Mishra, Sourav Kumar, Ayesha Iqra, One-year continuous abstinence rate for smoking cessation via telephonic counselling: The Indian scenario , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 93 No. 2 (2023)
- Manoranjan Pattnaik, Jeetendra Kumar Patra, Onkar Kumar Jha, Endobronchial ultrasound sonographic characteristics of mediastinal lymph node in the evaluation of lung cancer , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 94 No. 2 (2024)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.