https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2023.2700
Comparison of lung ultrasound technique versus clinical method to evaluate the accuracy of size and placement of left endobronchial double lumen tube in patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery: a prospective observational study
Submitted: July 5, 2023
Accepted: September 5, 2023
Published: September 18, 2023
Accepted: September 5, 2023
Abstract Views: 607
PDF_early view: 314
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Anthropometric measurements like height and gender have been frequently found to be inaccurate in prediction of size of double lumen tube (DLT). A tracheal ultrasonography (TUS) is a technique that can be used to predict the size of DLT and its correct placement for lung isolation. We aim to check the accuracy of ultrasound over clinical methods. This prospective study included 68 patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation (OLV) with DLT. The groups were assessed for the size of DLT by either anthropometric measurement using height and gender (Group C) or ultrasound method (Group U). Further, the accuracy of placement of DLT was assessed through, either lung auscultation in group C or various ultrasonographic and ventilatory parameters such as lung isolation in the first attempt (lung sliding and lung pulse sign), oxygenation status and peak airway pressure, in group U. Surgeon satisfaction score was also compared in both the groups. The accuracy of predicted DLT size between Group C and Group U was statistically significant (p=0.044). In Group C, 56% of patients showed a mismatch between the predicted DLT size and the actual size required, while in Group U, the mismatch was only 32.4%. The accuracy of DLT placement through group C was 41% as compared to 79% in Group U. Surgeon satisfaction score was also significantly higher in Group U as compared to Group C (p=0.0028). Thus, our study suggests that tracheal and chest ultrasonography for DLT size selection and placement for lung isolation is superior to clinical methods.
Bahk JH, Lim YJ, Kim CS. Positioning of a double-lumen endobronchial tube without the aid of any instruments: an implication for emergency management. J Trauma 2000;49:899-902.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200011000-00018
Moloney JT, Fowler SJ, Chang W. Anesthetic management of thoracic trauma. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008;21:41-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f2aadc
Smith GB, Hirsch NP, Ehrenwerth J. Placement of double-lumen endobronchial tubes. Correlation between clinical impressions and bronchoscopic findings. Br J Anaesth 1986;58:1317-20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/58.11.1317
Cohen E. Double-lumen tube position should be confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2004;17:1-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001503-200402000-00002
Klein U, Karzai W, Bloos F, et al. Role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in conjunction with the use of double-lumen tubes for thoracic anesthesia: a prospective study. Anesthesiology 1998;88:346-50.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199802000-00012
Weaver B, Lyon M, Blaivas M. Confirmation of endotracheal tube placement after intubation using the ultrasound sliding lung sign. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:239-44.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.014
Brodsky JB, Macario A, Mark JB. Tracheal diameter predicts double-lumen tube size: a method for selecting left double-lumen tubes. Anesth Analg 1996;82:861-4.
Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ. Tracheal width and left double-lumen tube size: a formula to estimate left-bronchial width. J Clin Anesth 2005;17:267-70.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.07.008
Eldawlatly AA. Double lumen tube: Size and insertion depth. Saudi J Anaesth 2021;15:280-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_192_21
Zhang C, Qin X, Zhou W, et al. Prediction of left double-lumen tube size by measurement of cricoid cartilage transverse diameter by ultrasound and CT multi-planar reconstruction. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:657612.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.657612
Brodsky JB, Macario A, Mark JB. Tracheal diameter predicts double-lumen tube size: a method for selecting left double-lumen tubes. Anesth Analg 1996;82:861-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199604000-00032
Chow MY, Liam BL, Lew TW, et al. Predicting the size of a double-lumen endobronchial tube based on tracheal diameter. Anesth Analg 1998;87:158-60.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199807000-00033
Parab SY, Kumar P, Divatia JV, Sharma K. A prospective randomized controlled double-blind study comparing auscultation and lung ultrasonography in the assessment of double lumen tube position in elective thoracic surgeries involving one lung ventilation at a tertiary care cancer institute. Korean J Anesthesiol 2019;72:24-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.d.17.00081
Ramsingh D, Frank E, Haughton R, et al. Auscultation versus point-of-care ultrasound to determine endotracheal versus bronchial intubation: a diagnostic accuracy study. Anesthesiology 2016;124:1012-20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001073
Parab SY, Divatia JV, Chogle A. A prospective comparative study to evaluate the utility of lung ultrasonography to improve the accuracy of traditional clinical methods to confirm position of left sided double lumen tube in elective thoracic surgeries. Indian J Anaesth 2015;59:476-81.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.162983
Lichtenstein DA, Lascols N, Prin S, Mezière G. The "lung pulse": an early ultrasound sign of complete atelectasis. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:2187-92.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1930-9
Breitkreutz R, Seibel A, Zechner PM. Ultrasound-guided evaluation of lung sliding for widespread use? Resuscitation 2012;83:273-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.12.034
Lyon M, Walton P, Bhalla V, Shiver SA. Ultrasound detection of the sliding lung sign by prehospital critical care providers. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:485-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2011.01.009
Sustić A, Protić A, Cicvarić T, Zupan Z. The addition of a brief ultrasound examination to clinical assessment increases the ability to confirm placement of double-lumen endotracheal tubes. J Clin Anesth 2010;22:246-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.07.010
Álvarez-Díaz N, Amador-García I, Fuentes-Hernández M, Dorta-Guerra R. Comparison between transthoracic lung ultrasound and a clinical method in confirming the position of double-lumen tube in thoracic anaesthesia. A pilot study. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2015;62:305-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2014.06.001
Saporito A, Lo Piccolo A, Franceschini D, et al. Thoracic ultrasound confirmation of correct lung exclusion before one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery. J Ultrasound 2013;16:195-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-013-0050-9
Ethics Approval
The study protocol was approved by Institutional Human Ethics Committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IndiaHow to Cite
Gupta, Ekta, Pooja Singh, Sunaina Tejpal Karna, Yogesh Niwariya, Vaishali Waindeskar, Sourabh Jain, Rajesh Panda, and Sandeep Kumar. 2023. “Comparison of Lung Ultrasound Technique <em>versus< em> Clinical Method to Evaluate the Accuracy of Size and Placement of Left Endobronchial Double Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study”. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease, September. https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2023.2700.
Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- F. Ravenna, S. Saturni, A. Casalini, F.P. Pilato, C. Pasquini, G. Caramori, A. Papi, Bronchial glomus tumor mimicking a COPD exacerbation , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 75 No. 3 (2011): Pulmonary series
- Cristina Rosi, Sonia Pennella, Anna Laura Fantuzzi, Patrizia Pedrazzi, Marilena Passalacqua, Manuela Gavioli, Mario Migaldi, Alberto Farinetti, Anna Vittoria Mattioli, The usefulness of Moynihan questionnaire in the evaluation of knowledge on healthy diet of patients undergoing cardiology rehabilitation , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 80 No. 2 (2013): Cardiac series
- Evgenia I. Kalamara, Evangelos T. Ballas, Georgia Pitsiou, Guergana Petrova, Pulmonary rehabilitation for cystic fibrosis: A narrative review of current literature , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 91 No. 2 (2021)
- P.M. RodrÃguez Suárez, J.L. Freixinet Gilart, Pleurodesis in the treatment of pneumothorax and pleural effusion , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 79 No. 2 (2013): Pulmonary series
- Raffaele Griffo, Antonio Spanevello, Pier Luigi Temporelli, Pompilio Faggiano, Mauro Carone, Giovanna Magni, Nicolino Ambrosino, Luigi Tavazzi, Italian survey on prevalence and disease management of chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease comorbidity in ambulatory patients. SUSPIRIUM study rationale and design , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 82 No. 1 (2014): Cardiac series
- D. Anyfantakis, E.K. Symvoulakis, I. Mitrouska, Managing venous thromboembolic events in daily practise: ‘‘time is never enough’’ , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 71 No. 2 (2009): Pulmonary series
- G. Caramori, G. Bettoncelli, M. Carone, R. Tosatto, P. Di Blasi, A. Pieretto, G. Invernizzi, B. Franco Novelletto, A. Ciaccia, I.M. Adcock, A. Papi, Degree of control of physiciandiagnosed asthma and COPD in Italy , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 67 No. 1 (2007): Pulmonary series
- Lucrezia De Michele, Paola Pierucci, Guido Giovannetti, Arnaldo Scardapane, Carlo D'agostino, Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano, Authors’ response to the Letter to the Editor regarding: Post severe COVID-19 infection lung damages study. The experience of early three months multidisciplinary follow-up , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 92 No. 4 (2022)
- Nian Patel, Robert Nicolae, Georgios Geropoulos, Pallabhi Mandal, Chrysanthos D. Christou, Marianna Gavala, Nikolaos Madouros, Michail Papapanou, Rahul Mogal, Dimitrios Giannis, Konstantinos S. Kechagias, Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos, Pneumomediastinum in the COVID-19 era: to drain or not to drain? , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 93 No. 2 (2023)
- R. Agarwal, A. Khan, A.N. Aggarwal, D. Gupta, Is the SMART approach better than other treatment approaches for prevention of asthma exacerbations? A meta-analysis , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 71 No. 4 (2009): Pulmonary series
<< < 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
