https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2023.2732

The ability of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale (RCS) to capture disability in respiratory patients admitted for in-hospital rehabilitation

Early Access
Submitted: July 26, 2023
Accepted: November 6, 2023
Published: November 21, 2023
rehabilitation, respiratory disability, COPD, outcomes, chronic respiratory failure
Abstract Views: 755
PDF_early view: 323
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale for respiratory patients Italian network
michele.vitacca@icsmaugeri.it

The aim of this pilot retrospective study was to test the Rehabilitation complexity scale (RCS-E v13) in patients from 15 Italian pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) units and correlate RCS-E v13 to the most used clinical and functional outcome measures. At admission and discharge, clinical data [comorbidities with the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS)], Barthel Index (BI), Barthel Index dyspnea (BI-d), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), and six-minute walking test (6MWT) were collected, and RCS-E total score calculated. Two-hundred nineteen patients [30.6% COPD, 43.4% chronic respiratory failure (CRF), and 26% with invasive ventilation (IV)], aged 69.9 (11.2) years were considered. RCS-E at admission 8.63 (1.69), 11.06 (2.50), 16.56 (2.97) and discharge 0.84 (1.02), 2.19 (1.5), 7.09 (1.47)] for COPD, CRF and IV respectively were statistically differed among groups (ANOVA p = <0.0001). RCS-E v13 total score strongly negatively correlated with 6MWT [(rho= -0.7305 (-07883; -0.6598)] and BI [(rho= - 0.6989 ( -0.7626; - 0.6217)]) while weakly with CAT [(rho = 0.2939 (0.1601; 0.4170)] and BI-d [(rho = 0.3512 (0.2243; 0.4663)]. Change in RCS-E v13 total score [(mean change of -8.70 (95% IC -9.00; -8.40)] )  as in all single RCS-E v13 items [care -0.59 (95%IC -0.69, -0.48); risk -0.56 (95%IC -0.78;-0.46); nursing needs -2.11 (95%IC -2.22;-2.01); medical needs -2.29 (95%IC -2.39;-2.18); therapy disciplines -1.45 (95%IC -1.57; -1.33); therapy intensity -2.00 (95%IC -2.07; -1,93); equipment -0.23( 95%IC -0.30; -0.16)] was found significant after PR. The RCS-E v13 application for patients with respiratory diseases is feasible and highlights a huge difference among different conditions. Its application seems to present an important care burden and relation with motor disability and effort tolerance but a lower relation with dyspnea during activities of daily living, comorbidities, and disease impact. A more robust sample and prospective analysis on the usefulness of the RSC-E v13 in patients with respiratory diseases during rehabilitation are welcomed.

 

@ The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale in respiratory patients - Italian Network 

  1. Michele Vitacca, MD, FERS ICS Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory rehabilitation of the Institute of Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy
  2. Luca Bianchi, MD Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, “Centro Spalenza”, Respiratory rehabilitation, Rovato, Brescia, Italy
  3. Piero Ceriana, MD ICS Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory rehabilitation of the Institute of Pavia, Italy
  4. Francesco Gigliotti, MD Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, IRCCS "Don Carlo Gnocchi", Respiratory rehabilitation Firenze, Italy
  5. Rodolfo Murgia, MD ICS Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory rehabilitation of the Institute of Montescano, Pavia, Italy
  6. Alessia Fumagalli, MD Istituto nazionale Riposo e Cura per Anziani di Casatenovo, Respiratory rehabilitation, Casatenovo, Lecco, Italy
  7. Antonio Spanevello, MD ICS Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory rehabilitation of the Institute of Tradate, Varese, Italy
  8. Giuseppe La Piana, MD Ospedale "Santa Marta" di Rivolta d'Adda, Respiratory rehabilitation Rivolta d'Adda, Cremona, Italy
  9. Bruno Balbi, MD ICS Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory rehabilitation of the Institute of Veruno Veruno, Novara, Italy
  10. Sara Forlani, MD, Presidio Ospedaliero di Sant'Angelo Lodigiano, Respiratory rehabilitation Sant'Angelo Lodigiano, Lodi, Italy
  11. Maria Aliani, MD ICS Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory rehabilitation of the Institute of Bari, Italy
  12. Gianfranco Beghi, MD Ospedale Villa Pineta, Respiratory rehabilitation, Pavullo nel Frignano, Modena, Italy
  13. Mauro Maniscalco, MD ICS Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation of the Institute of Telese, Benevento, Italy
  14. Giuseppe Fiorentino, MD Ospedale Monaldi, Azienda Ospedaliera Specialistica dei Colli, Respiratory rehabilitation, Napoli, Italy
  15. Paolo Banfi, MD Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, IRCCS “Centro S. Maria Nascente”, Respiratory rehabilitation, Milano, Italy

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Turner-Stokes L, Disler R, Williams H. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale: a simple, practical tool to identify ‘complex specialised’ services in neurological rehabilitation. Clin Med (Lond) 2007;7:593-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.7-6-593
Saverino A, Sonabend R, Wong S, Symeon C. The Wolfson Assessment Matrix: a potential tool to support clinicians in establishing access to specialized neuro rehabilitation by capturing important prognostic factors. Sharing more equitable and transparent criteria. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2022;58:161-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.07022-2
Turner-Stokes L, Scott H, Williams H, et al. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale--extended version: detection of patients with highly complex needs. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:715-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.615880
Galletti L, Benedetti MG, Maselli S, et al. Rehabilitation Complexity Scale: Italian translation and transcultural validation. Disabil Rehabil 2016;38:87-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1024340
Roda F, Agosti M, Merlo A, et al. Psychometric validation of the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended version 13. PLoS One 2017;12:e0178453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178453
Italian Ministry of Health. [prot. DAR 11216: “Criteri di appropriatezza dell’accesso ai ricoveri di riabilitazione ospedaliera” and “Linee di indirizzo per l’individuazione di percorsi appropriati nella rete di riabilitazione”. 21th July 2021].[in Italian]. Ministero della Salute, Rome.
Italian Ministry of Health. [Ricoveri ospedalieri in Italia: il Rapporto SDO 2020 (ISS.IT). Ministero della Salute, Direzione generale della programmazione sanitaria Ufficio 6. Rapporto annuale sull’attività di ricovero ospedaliero DATI SDO 2020].[in Italian]. Available from: https://www.salute.gov.it/portale/documentazione/p6_2_2_1.jsp?lingua=italiano&id=3277
Compalati E, Volpato E, Volpi V, Banfi P. [Preliminary data of an exploratory survey about Italian rehabilitation Pulmonology centres].[Article in Italian with English Abstract]. Rassegna Patol Appar Respir 2022;37:191-4.
Spruit MA, Singh S, Garvey C, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;188: e13–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201308-1509ST
Linn BS, Linn MW, Gurel L. Cumulative illness rating scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 1968;16:622-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1968.tb02103.x
Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989;42:703-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6
Vitacca M, Paneroni M, Baiardi P, et al. Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnoea for patients with respiratory diseases. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2016;11:1199-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S104376
Joes PW, Harding G, Berry P, et al. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. Eur Respir J 2009;34:648-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00102509
Holland AE, Spruit MA, Troosters T, et al. An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J 2014;44:1428-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00150314
Hoffman K, West A, Nott P, et al. Measuring acute rehabilitation needs in trauma: preliminary evaluation of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale. Injury 2013;44:104-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.11.001

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS (2713 EC, 16th December 2022).

Supporting Agencies

Ministry of Health, Italy

How to Cite

Italian network, The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale for respiratory patients. 2023. “The Ability of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale (RCS) to Capture Disability in Respiratory Patients Admitted for in-Hospital Rehabilitation”. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease, November. https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2023.2732.
Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.


Similar Articles

<< < 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.