https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.3033
Respiratory rate-oxygenation index on the 3rd day is the best predictor of treatment failure in COVID-19 patients
Accepted: September 17, 2024
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: 7
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Predictors of outcomes are essential to identifying severe COVID-19 cases and optimizing treatment and care settings. The respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index, originally introduced for predicting the failure of non-invasive support in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), has not been extensively studied over time during hospitalization. This multicenter prospective observational study analyzed COVID-19-related AHRF patients admitted to eight Italian hospitals during the second pandemic wave. The study assessed the ROX index using receiver operator characteristic curves and areas under the curve with 95% confidence intervals to predict treatment failure, defined as endotracheal intubation (ETI) or death. A total of 227 patients (69.2% males) were enrolled, with a median arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio at admission of 248 (interquartile range: 170-295). Nearly one-third (29.5%) required ETI or died during hospitalization. Those who experienced treatment failure were older (median age 70 versus 61 years, p<0.001), more likely to be current or former smokers (8.5% versus 6.4% and 42.4% versus 25.5%, p=0.039), had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (74.6% versus 46.3%, p<0.001), and had a lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio at presentation (median 229 versus 254, p=0.014). Gender, body mass index, and other comorbidities showed no significant differences. In patients who failed treatment, the ROX index was higher at presentation and worsened sharply by days 3 and 4. Conversely, in patients who survived without requiring ETI, the ROX index remained stable and reduced after 5-6 days. The ROX index's predictive ability improved notably by the third day of hospitalization, with the best cut-off value identified at 8.53 (sensitivity 75%, specificity 68%). Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that a ROX index of 8.53 or lower on days 1, 2, or 3 was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure. Thus, a single ROX index assessment on day 3 is more informative than its variability over time, with values of 8.53 or lower predicting non-invasive respiratory support failure in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Ethics Approval
This study was approved by the respective ethics committees involved (Comitato etico di Bergamo - n.308-20, 05/02/2021; Comitato etico della Brianza - EC approval on 02/04/2021; Comitato etico di Ferrara - n.373/2021/Oss/AOUFe, 22/04/2021; Comitato etico Ospedale Sacco Milano - n.2021/ST/091, 19/04/2021; Comitato etico di Palermo - n.3/2021, 31/03/2021; Comitato etico Policlinico Milano - n.433/2021, 23/04/2021; Comitato etico San Paolo Milano - n.965, 21/04/2021; Comitato etico di Verona - n.3171CESC, 11/03/2021).How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Carmine Guarino, Ilaria Pedicelli, Francesco Perna, Valentina Di Spirito, Giuseppe Fiorentino, Fabio Procaccini, Gaetano Rea, E-cigarette, or vaping, product use Associated Lung Injury (EVALI): new scenarios for physicians and radiologists , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 92 No. 3 (2022)
- Omkar K. Choudhari, Umesh Chandra Ojha, Dipti Gothi, Sonam Spalgais, Pratap Singh, Anita Rani, Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage secondary to plastic fume exposure: A case report , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 90 No. 3 (2020)
- Rafael Martínez-Girón, Liron Pantanowitz, Pulmonary actinomycosis: cytomorphological features , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 92 No. 2 (2022)
- Ugo Corrà, Massimo Piepoli, Andrea Giordano, Difference in prevalence of exertional oscillatory ventilation between healthy subjects and patients with cardiovascular disease , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 90 No. 1 (2020)
- Cristiano van Zeller, Asad Anwar, Nordita Ramos-Bascon, Natalie Barnes, Brendan Madden, Pulmonary function, computerized tomography features and six-minute walk test at three months in severe COVID-19 patients treated with intravenous pulsed methylprednisolone: a preliminary report , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 91 No. 4 (2021)
- Ramakant Dixit, Mukesh Goya, Kamendra Singh Pawar, Neena Kasliwal, Shreya Agarwal, Occult carcinoma penis presenting as malignant pleural effusion , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 90 No. 4 (2020)
- Nidal Tourkmani, Treatment and management of advanced heart failure in elderly , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 89 No. 1 (2019)
- Carlo Iadevaia, Fabio Perrotta, Grazia Mazzeo, Francesco Saverio Cerqua, Gennaro Mazzarella, Salvatore Guarino, Roberto Parrella, Andrea Bianco, Incidental diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma following coronavirus OC 43 severe pneumonia , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 90 No. 3 (2020)
- Dario Amore, Dino Casazza, Alessandro Saglia, Pasquale Imitazione, Umberto Caterino, Carlo Curcio, How to avoid "en masse" lobectomy using VATS technique in presence of hilar fibrosis , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 91 No. 2 (2021)
- Edoardo Sciatti, Ugo Nesti, Andrea Di Lenarda, Indirect comparison between ferric carboxymaltose and oral iron replacement in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 91 No. 3 (2021)
<< < 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
