https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.3033
Respiratory rate-oxygenation index on the 3rd day is the best predictor of treatment failure in COVID-19 patients
Accepted: September 17, 2024
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: 7
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Predictors of outcomes are essential to identifying severe COVID-19 cases and optimizing treatment and care settings. The respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index, originally introduced for predicting the failure of non-invasive support in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), has not been extensively studied over time during hospitalization. This multicenter prospective observational study analyzed COVID-19-related AHRF patients admitted to eight Italian hospitals during the second pandemic wave. The study assessed the ROX index using receiver operator characteristic curves and areas under the curve with 95% confidence intervals to predict treatment failure, defined as endotracheal intubation (ETI) or death. A total of 227 patients (69.2% males) were enrolled, with a median arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio at admission of 248 (interquartile range: 170-295). Nearly one-third (29.5%) required ETI or died during hospitalization. Those who experienced treatment failure were older (median age 70 versus 61 years, p<0.001), more likely to be current or former smokers (8.5% versus 6.4% and 42.4% versus 25.5%, p=0.039), had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (74.6% versus 46.3%, p<0.001), and had a lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio at presentation (median 229 versus 254, p=0.014). Gender, body mass index, and other comorbidities showed no significant differences. In patients who failed treatment, the ROX index was higher at presentation and worsened sharply by days 3 and 4. Conversely, in patients who survived without requiring ETI, the ROX index remained stable and reduced after 5-6 days. The ROX index's predictive ability improved notably by the third day of hospitalization, with the best cut-off value identified at 8.53 (sensitivity 75%, specificity 68%). Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that a ROX index of 8.53 or lower on days 1, 2, or 3 was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure. Thus, a single ROX index assessment on day 3 is more informative than its variability over time, with values of 8.53 or lower predicting non-invasive respiratory support failure in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Ethics Approval
This study was approved by the respective ethics committees involved (Comitato etico di Bergamo - n.308-20, 05/02/2021; Comitato etico della Brianza - EC approval on 02/04/2021; Comitato etico di Ferrara - n.373/2021/Oss/AOUFe, 22/04/2021; Comitato etico Ospedale Sacco Milano - n.2021/ST/091, 19/04/2021; Comitato etico di Palermo - n.3/2021, 31/03/2021; Comitato etico Policlinico Milano - n.433/2021, 23/04/2021; Comitato etico San Paolo Milano - n.965, 21/04/2021; Comitato etico di Verona - n.3171CESC, 11/03/2021).How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- X. Dhalluin, A. Scherpereel, Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: current status and future directions , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 73 No. 2 (2010): Pulmonary series
- Gianaugusto Slavich, Paola Mapelli, Rudy Fregolent, Massimo Slavich, Duilio Tuniz, Non ST ergometric variables in the diabetic patient and their prognostic significance , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 74 No. 1 (2010): Cardiac series
- I.A. Brownlee, A. Aseeri, C. Ward, J.P. Pearson, From gastric aspiration to airway inflammation , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 73 No. 2 (2010): Pulmonary series
- Angelo Compare, Domenico Del Forno, Edward Callus, Francesco Giallauria, Alessandra Vitelli, Claudio Buccelli, Carlo Vigorito, Post-traumatic stress disorder, emotional processing and Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks: clinical consideration by a single case report , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 78 No. 3 (2012): Cardiac series
- Martina Turrin, Mariaenrica Tinè, Umberto Semenzato, Manuel Cosio, Marina Saetta, Kim Lokar Oliani, Multiple pulmonary nodules presenting a difficult diagnostic challenge , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 90 No. 4 (2020)
- Gian Francesco Mureddu, Pompilio Faggiano, Fausto Rigo, Cardiovascular risk prediction in the real world. The discouraging evidences coming from literature , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 78 No. 4 (2012): Cardiac series
- J.A. Gullón, I. Suárez, M. Lecuona, R. Fernández, G. Rubinos, A. Medina, C. Cabrera, I. González, Time to culture conversion in smokers with pulmonary tuberculosis , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 71 No. 3 (2009): Pulmonary series
- F. Nicosia, L. Giordano, L. Bonini, L. Corda, M. Bolzon, M. Bettinzoli, A. Braghini, P. Accorsi, C. Tantucci, Hyperventilation and seizures in an adolescent female , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 79 No. 2 (2013): Pulmonary series
- Mario Tamburrini, Unnati Desai, Giovanni Fanti, Angelo Scarda, Francesca Zampieri, Umberto Zuccon, Parikshit Thakare, Marco Contoli, Alberto Papi, Medical thoracoscopy without pleural fluid: How I do it , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 92 No. 1 (2022)
- Despoina Moumtzi, Marianna Kakoura, Pulmonary embolism in Behcet's disease: a case report , Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease: Vol. 90 No. 4 (2020)
<< < 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
